login
Header Space

 
 

Re: Am I incorrect in assuming that my root partition can be an ext fs?

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

In article <CORYWEST.92Aug2144042@rio-grande.rice.edu> corywest@rice.edu (Cory West) writes:

0.96c doesn't mount any other type of filesystem than the original minix
one as root - you have to get 0.97.  0.97 should be able to mount any
type of filesystem (you could even have a msdos fs as your
root-partition if you are evil and perverse - but don't tell anyone or
they'll whisper about you behind your back). 

Note that I (surprise, surprise) haven't tested the new root-mounting
features.  I don't see why it shouldn't work, but assuming it doesn't,
please mail me about it.

0.97 also finally cleans up the 'struct super_block' information - it's
no longer at all minix-specific.  I got tired of hearing about it, and
when liljeber noticed problems with the msdos-fs in a pre-release I
decided to clean it up once and for all.  So now the minix filesystem is
in no way special: but it happens to be well tested, and should have no
bugs (famous last words), so it's the way to go if you aren't too
adventurous. 

                Linus
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Am I incorrect in assuming that my root partition can be..., Linus Benedict Torvalds, (Sun Aug 2, 6:26 pm)
speck-geostationary