In article <1992Aug11.152247.5160@cs.wisc.edu> djansa@aphrodite.cs.wisc.edu (Dean Jansa) writes: I have to agree 100% with you. The main reason I am so excited about Linux is thats is free, and the best damn OS I have ever used on a PC!! Linus and Co. worked hard to get this project going, and it has lit a fire under me!! I tell everyone about it, and help them get it if needed. I agree with everything but the first sentence (which refers to a post complaining about a service to distribute Linux on diskettes for a fee). Being a student, I know money is not that easy to come up with. I would hate to see a student not be able to get linux because they can't come up with 60 bucks. 19 disks?? What on earth are you giving them? I got the mcc release on 4! 5 more for X!! I _know_ that doesn't cost $60 bucks. Any student would be willing to pay for the disks, but 60 bucks?? Uh, reality check here. Why would a student "not be able to get linux"? Because they don't have $60? Perhaps, but _also_ because they don't have high-speed Internet access. Now, do you really believe it is up to you (and others) to do everything in your power to _prevent_ people without Internet access but who _can_ afford $60 from getting Linux? Let's keep Linux alive and well, and FREE!! Sheesh, not THIS ranting and raving again. Non-profit organizations like Syntropy distributing diskettes (is no basis for a system of government, ... whoops wrong speech :-) has no more effect on the "FREE" status of Linux than does the Free Software Foundation's distribution of tapes of GNU software. Both organizations charge for distribution; and what they distribute is available for "free" via Internet. Both organizations provide a service to those unable or unwilling to get the software over the net. If anything, the actions of Syntropy will _improve_ Linux (while still keeping it "free"). Please, read the GNU Public License (which protects around 90% or more of the canonical Linux utilities and 100% of Linux itself, apparently) before you spout off regarding what _other_ people are doing with _other_ people's software. And, if you don't want people distributing _your_ software for a fee, come up with your own license agreemnt -- neither the GPL nor public domain will do it for you. -- James Craig Burley, Software Craftsperson burley@gnu.ai.mit.edu Member of the League for Programming Freedom (LPF)
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc8 |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg KH | Linux 2.6.25.10 |
git: | |
| Sverre Rabbelier | Git vs Monotone |
| Robert Collins | Re: VCS comparison table |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: git-diff on touched files: bug or feature? |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry. |
| Steve Shockley | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| chefren | Re: [Fwd: Open-Hardware] |
| ropers | Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .. |
| Leon Dippenaar | New tcp stack attack |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| Ilpo Järvinen | Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
| Sangtae Ha | Re: A Linux TCP SACK Question |
