In article <1992Aug11.152247.5160@cs.wisc.edu> djansa@aphrodite.cs.wisc.edu (Dean Jansa) writes:As long as you have net access, it is true. You can get linux without having to pay a dime. But let us say that you wanted to distribute linux and sell it at cost. To start with, you would need to buy floppy discs. I think that the 1.44 probably go for around 1$ right now, but you might do a little better than that. Next each of these need to be formatted. That is not a fun job and no one is going to do it for free just because linux is so great. Ditto for copying the distribution to the discs and printing labels for the discs. Let us assume that you hire someone at minimum wage to do these tasks. You would also need to buy a couple of PC's to be used for duplicating discs (let us assume that you are running this out of your basement so you do not have to pay for electricity and rent). Finally, you will need to buy boxes of some kind, and pay for postage. Standing in line at the post office is about as much fun as formatting diskettes, so you would probably have your minimum wage person doing this as well, or you would have to buy a postage meter. You would also have your hired grunt open the mail, process orders, take checks to the bank, fill out the paperwork for Mastercard/Visa, and order supplies (discs, labels, boxes, etc). (Given these tasks I doubt that a minimum wage-type person would be suitable). $60 for 19 discs works out to about 3$ a disc. This does not strike me as being that unreasonable. The GPL requires that you receive the source code for each program in addition to the binaries. It is true that you could pack most of the binaries on 4 or 5 discs, but this would not be "free" in the sense that you would not have source code. There are frequent discussions on some of the gnu.* lists as to exactly what "free" means, but the point of the GPL is that you should be free to make modifications to the program, and you should be free to distribute the source code and binaries to other people. (I should also point out that RMS and co. charges about 200$ per tape with Emacs or GCC on it, and no one feels that this is unreasonable). From the "copying file": When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Specifically, the General Public License is designed to make sure that you have the freedom to give away or sell copies of free software, that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things. One of the freedoms that you do have with the GPL is that you can get together with some friends and buy one set of diskettes and then pass them around, and not break the law. If you do this, then your costs are quite a bit less than 60$. -Eric -- Eric Youngdale eric@tantalus.nrl.navy.mil
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc8 |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg KH | Linux 2.6.25.10 |
git: | |
| Sverre Rabbelier | Git vs Monotone |
| Robert Collins | Re: VCS comparison table |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: git-diff on touched files: bug or feature? |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry. |
| Steve Shockley | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| chefren | Re: [Fwd: Open-Hardware] |
| ropers | Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .. |
| Leon Dippenaar | New tcp stack attack |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| Ilpo Järvinen | Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
| Sangtae Ha | Re: A Linux TCP SACK Question |
