From: spedpr@thor.cf.ac.uk (Paul Richards) Date: 25 Mar 92 18:45:05 GMT However, the sentiments of many people working on Linux are understandably quite different. They get no financial benefits out of Linux and are working on it for fun and because it's a worthwhile project. If all you intend to do is provide a service and make a little money on the side then that's in this spirit. However, when you say things like, "can I make a living out of this" and the such like then their reaction is, not surprisingly, "why should I give my free time so that someone else can get rich". This is basically exploitation of others good intentions. Hmm... well, my reaction is that it doesn't make any difference if someone tries to make a buck off of Linux, since the GPL states that when something is distributed under the GPL, (1) the GPL must included as part of the distribution, in an obvious place, and (2) either the source must be included or a pointer to a place where the source can be made freely available. So anyone who gets pays $1000 for Linux will be immediately treated to the obvious fact that they can give it away to anybody they want. I find it very doubtful that anyone would be able to "make a living out of this" under these circumstances. Also, if there are really stupid people out there paying $1000/copy for Linux, you can be sure that I and several other people will immediately go out there and offer to sell copies of Linux for $500/copy, and then $100/copy, and then $20/copy..... and pretty soon the free market will take care of driving the price to "natural" levels. I really don't see the big deal and fuss.... the GPL is designed so no one will be able to make outrageous amounts of money over the mere distribution of the software. Support? That's a different matter; but if you are selling support, (like Cygnus), you need to put in a lot more effort yourself --- it's not like you're just mooching off the efforts of other people. - Ted
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| H. Peter Anvin | Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native format. |
| Christoph Lameter | Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
git: | |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [PATCH 06/32] IGET: Mark iget() and read_inode() as being obsolete [try #2] |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
