| 
| 
| In article <1992Mar10.174816.24606@athena.mit.edu>, you write:
| >
| > Gcc 2.0 seems released in the way I don't intend to be. I just found
| > out it is not compatible with 0.95. I am working on it now. Please
| > don't use gcc 2.0 with 0.95 kernel, 0.12 should be fine.
| > 
| > PLEASE REMEMBER GCC 2.0 IS JUST AN ALPHA. IT IS NOT VERY STABLE. YOU
| > CAN TEST IT. KEEP IN MIND IT MAY NOT WORK WITH YOUR SYSTEM. But of
| > courese, it works fine with my system.
| 
| I am somewhat confused.  How does your version of 2.0 correlate with Linus' 2.0
| that he used to build the "official" version of 0.95?  What should we be using
| to build 0.95?  thanx.
| 
|       -paul
| 

There are two sys calls, isatty and ttyname, which are used by gcc 2.0
but missing from 0.95. I have the patches for 0.12 kernel. They won't
work with 0.95 since those sys call numbers are used by the other sys
calls. Something has to be done before use gcc 2.0 with 0.95 kernel.


H.J.
-- 
School of EECS                          Internet: hlu@eecs.wsu.edu
Washington State University             BITNET:   60935893@WSUVM1.BITNET
Pullman, WA 99164                       Phone:    (509) 335-6470 (O)
USA                                               (509) 334-6315 (H)