login
Header Space

 
 

Re: IMPORTANT [BUG in 0.99] Re: [ANNOUNCE]: linux version 0.99

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Date: Tuesday, December 29, 1992 - 9:17 pm

Stephen Williams (sdw@meaddata.com) wrote:
: Lars Wirzenius (wirzeniu@klaava.Helsinki.FI) wrote:
..
: 
: Statics are either explicitly initialized or they are not.
: If they are not, their contents are UNDEFINED until set.
: This is per ANSI C.
: 
: There is NO requirement of the compiler or system to zero
: un-initialized statics (or auto's).
: 
: The fact that some systems waste time doing so is no reason rely on it
: as a feature.  This was already debated and tossed out as something to
: rely on.
NOT!!!

Gosh... I HATE it when I'm wrong....
Really, it was true somewhere... back in the K&R dark ages... honestly...

Obviously, I should have CHECKED.

Actually, I'm glad it's this way....

Well... Ces L'Vie... (sp?).

I've always said (after a juicy screwup), you need a humbling
experience every once in a while to put things in perspective....

sdw
--
Stephen D. Williams  Local Internet Gateway Co.; SDW Systems 513 496-5223APager
LIG dev./sales       Internet: sdw@world.std.com CIS 76244.210@compuserve.com
OO R&D Source Dist.  By Horse: 10028 Village Tree Ct., Miamisburg, OH 45342
GNU Support          ICBM: 39 34N 85 15W I love it when a plan comes together
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: IMPORTANT [BUG in 0.99] Re: [ANNOUNCE]: linux version 0.99, Stephen Williams, (Tue Dec 29, 9:17 pm)
speck-geostationary