login
Header Space

 
 

Re: 486SXs as Unix Iron?

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Date: Friday, October 30, 1992 - 3:38 pm

In article <BwsHJr.LnJ@unix.amherst.edu> twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:


Agreed.


This is Eric's politics coming to the fore. A 486SX is a better choice than
any 386DX I know of. The 487SX is a scam, but most competantly designed
motherboards support the 486SX or DX with a jumper change.

Eric's a nice guy, he's just got less tolerance for marketing bullshit than
most and it shows. Objectively, the 486SX is an OK chip, and the marketing
bullshit can be avoided by careful motherboard choices.
-- 
% Peter da Silva % 77487-5012 % +1 713 274 5180 % Har du kramat din varg idag?
/C{setlinecap}def/L{lineto}def/M{moveto}def/H{newpath 0 C 0 19 M 0 25 L 4 21 L
0 16 M 5 16 L 8 13 L 4 13 L 1 16 L 8 13 M 8 8 L stroke 2 C 10 6 M 8 8 L 10 8 L
stroke}def/T{translate}def 72 72 T 24 24 scale H 20 0 T -1 1 scale H showpage
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: 486SXs as Unix Iron?, peter da silva, (Fri Oct 30, 3:38 pm)
speck-geostationary