In article <1992Oct23.065742.18933@sobeco.com> alawrenc@sobeco.com writes: > In <JEM.92Oct22224058@lk-hp-6.hut.fi> jem@snakemail.hut.fi (Johan Myreen) writes: > > >The Linux console does quite a good job emulating a vt100. > > Yes, the Linux console does do a good job of emulating a vt100 which > does a good job of emulating a KSR-35 teletype. Perhaps however, we > should consider the possiblities that the hardware allows us, and > consider making enhancements to the system to exploit those possibilities. I am curious. Since most of us run Linux on machines that support VGA color, would it be very difficult to emulate a VT-340 graphic terminal? I am not saying that it is the most useful thing in the world or that I want it. I am just wondering if it would be possible. > Andrew Lawrence, Informaticien Conseil | alawrenc@sobeco.com -- Satish K. Chittamuru satishc@microsoft.com ===== Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein, either stated or implied, are solely my own and do not reflect Microsoft's views in any manner.
| Paul Jackson | Re: cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets |
| James Bottomley | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| David Miller | Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Masami Hiramatsu | Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Parag Warudkar | Re: 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
