Ok, I forgot to mention this in my last post, but I'm afraid I'll have to warn all of you that want to implement a new feature: I will not accept big non-localized patches to 0.12. This doesn't mean you cannot implement something neat, but it does mean that it probably won't be in 0.13 unless it's so neat I cannot live without it. There are good reasons for this: I'll have to do some studuing that I missed the last semester due to working on linux, and the courses start tomorrow. That was one of the reasons for the fixed release-date of the current version. Also, VFS support (which is missing in 0.12, although there were alpha-patches for it) will probably be implemented for 0.13, and I need a relatively clean kernel for that: as pmacdona found out, the patches that get in put after other patches have to be extensively edited to fit. This does NOT mean that I won't accept bug-reports and patches. Also, it doesn't mean I won't accept the init/login package: I assume that won't touch the kernel very much. I hope this won't be a big problem: most of the things people wanted are in 0.12. And with VFS we'll eventually get the longer filenames that was also high on the list of wanted things. Linus
| Michal Piotrowski | Re: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Fred Tyler | Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20 |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Antonio Almeida | HTB accuracy for high speed |
