I'm looking for a few people who are willing to take a look at my changes to add job control to Linux and test them out. The ideal alpha tester is someone who is willing to try out these changes and see if 1) they can find some way of using job control which breaks my implementation, 2) if they conflict with changes they are planning to make to the kernel (mostly changes in exit.c and signal.c, with additional changes in tty_io.c, tty_ioctl.c, sys.c, and open.c), and/or 3) if they reasonably correspond with other implementations of job control, particularily BSD 4.3 and Sys V. I make no guarantees about the correctness of these patches, and any future patches which I send out will be relative to Linux 0.11, NOT to these alpha patches. The main reason why I want people to try them out is that I've implemented job control almost entirely from the POSIX spec, and I would other people to check to see if my interpretation of the POSIX spec is compatible with the rest of the world. If you feel up to trying them out, please let me know. If you want to look at the changes before deciding, they can be found in TSX-11:~ftp/ALPHA/jobcontrol. One generic bug which will hit when you try this is out is that apparently there is a bug with how gcc handles signals. If you send gcc a SIGCONT (you don't even need to stop it first), it will die with an IOT trap. I suspect gcc needs to be recompiled with a recent libc.a to fix this problem. - Ted
| Davide Libenzi | [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 018/196] coda: convert struct class_device to struct device |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| David Newall | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
git: | |
| Christoph Lameter | Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
