Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1991 15:53:55 +0200 From: Linus Benedict Torvalds <torvalds@cc.helsinki.fi> gets symbolic links. I think the easiest way is to move downwards from the "to"-directory via ".." until one hits root (or a mount-point) or the "from"-directory. It shouldn't be hard, it's just SMOP. Well, the problem is that another rename() could be happening while you are traversing up the tree (towards the root) checking to see if you hit the "from" directory. The simplest case where you will have a problem is if rename(/a/b, /a/c/d) and rename(a/c, a/b/e) are running in parallel. Another problem is that two rename()'s could try to move the same directory to two different places. Now, locking takes care of this quite nicely, but the interesting CS question is how little locking can you do and still be make things be "correct." Or, is there some way that we can finesse the issue without using locks? tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o): > Speaking of hard disk corruptions, I've found an easy way to get Linux > to corrupt the hard disk. Simply follow the following instructions: Happily, things aren't that bad (I think). I don't think it's a buffer-cache problem (which is hell to find - lots of race conditions etc. I kno - I had those kinds too), but a problem with handling "out of disk space". That's still bad, but easier to spot. Could you (tytso) check if the partition filled up? It's probably a bug in one of tha namei.c-routines which want a new block, and crap out if they cannot get it. I'll look. No, my partition didn't fill. Originally I tried it with a partition size of 65535, so I had lots of free space. I then tried it with "mkfs /dev/hd3 32768"; the problem still happened. The second time, I noticed the following things: * /etc/fsck reported that the disk was completely happy before I ran "compress -d < /tmp/gcc.tar.Z | tar xvf -" * During the untaring process, there was at least one time when tar printed somthing like this: ./stbout.h tar: Cannot change owner of stdbout.h: ENOENT tar: Cannot change modification times of stdbout.h: ENOENT tar: (One more error message which I don't remember): ENOENT This tends to indicate that the file just disappeared after tar closed it, so it couldn't adjust the ownership and mod times. Perhaps a directory update is getting lost? * After tar finished, I sync'ed the disks and tried running /etc/fsck again. This time, it reported 10 "Inode not in use, nlinks=0, counted=1" errors for 10 consecutive inodes starting at #82, and 9 "Inode in use, nlinks=1, counted=0" errors for 9 consecutive inodes starting at #143. This persisted after I logged out and reboot the system. * Upon reboot the disk statistics which were printed were: 12876/32768 free blocks 10461/10930 free inodes 1500 buffers = 1536000 bytes buffer space free mem: 14680064 bytes * If you run a "ls -l" on the directory into which tar placed files (where stbout.h disappeared), you will get a kernel panic: "free_inode: bit already cleared". I wonder if the problem is due to the fact that I was using the same drive for both source and destination for the "compress -d | tar xvf -" pipeline. I did notice that it was very slow, presumably because there was a lot of buffer thrashing going on. - Ted
| Parag Warudkar | BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0] |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 010/196] Chinese: add translation of Codingstyle |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 24/37] dccp: Processing Confirm options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| david | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
