First, it would be better if the comment from the cover letter about
this patch (quoted below) was [also] put as the comment for this
patch (i.e. in this area).
Second, I don't quite understand the reason for your amendment. The
difference is between two argument
install [OPTION]... SOURCE DEST
in my original version of this patch, and two argument
install [OPTION]... SOURCE DIRECTORY
after your change. In both cases we install _single_ file at once.
What problems first version may cause if $(gitweblibdir) is used
and it points elsewhere than $(gitwebdir)/lib?
Third, if you were folloring git mailing list (or at least patches for
gitweb on it), you would notice new version of my "gitweb: Prepare for
splitting gitweb" patch:
"[PATCHv3/RFC] gitweb: Prepare for splitting gitweb"
Message-ID: <201007080920.38724.jnareb@gmail.com>
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/150463/focus=150544
which uses shell for loop, instead of make's $(foreach ...) function to
avoid _possible_ problems with generating a command line that exceeded
the maximum argument list length, as explained in comment section of
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/150463/focus=150463
Note that this version uses SOURCE DIRECTORY version rather than
SOURCE DEST, like in your patch... probably unnecessary.
In "[PATCHv3/RFC] gitweb: Prepare for splitting gitweb" this spurious
change was removed from patch.
Anyway, eventual replacing of this patch by other version should be
fairly easy, so it shouldn't hold this series.
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html