Pete Harlan <pgit@pcharlan.com> writes:

quoted text
> On 05/09/2010 04:02 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 06:23:21PM -0700, Pete Harlan wrote:
>> 
>>> "git clone foo bar" currently reports "Cloning into
>>> /path/to/bar/.git".  Change this message to "Cloning into bar" to more
>>> closely match the user's expectation.
>> 
>> I am a little torn on this. For most users, it is just another
>> implementation detail that makes git's output more confusing. And it is
>> likely to be the very first git message seen by many people. But at the
>> same time, it is telling you where the repository actually is, which is
>> something that can help users learn about how git works.
>> 
>> I guess it comes down to how much detail we want to show.
>
> For me it isn't only a matter of detail; I find "Cloning into
> bar/.git" misleading, since bar is getting more than a .git directory.

That is also misleading, as cloning is done into bar/.git and everything
else happens locally as part of the checkout.

I didn't want to go into nitpicky details, but you asked for it ;-)

quoted text
> Pete Harlan (2):
>   clone: have progress report mention top level dir, not git dir
>   clone: add bare clone to the progress message

I think the squashing these two into one patch makes quite a lot of
sense.  Does any of the existing test need adjustments, by the way?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html