Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 1/4] Add "core.eolStyle" variable to control end-of-line conversion

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Saturday, May 8, 2010 - 2:57 pm

On Sat, 8 May 2010, Eyvind Bernhardsen wrote:

So I at least agree with the semantics now, but I think that we really 
would be better off just calling it "core.crlf". I don't _care_ whether 
people think it's a bad name - much worse than a bad name is to use a name 
that is not consistent. 

Having two config variables named "core.autocrlf" and "core.crlf" at least 
is consistent. Having "autocrlf" and "eolStyle" is just messed up.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH/RFC v2 0/4] End-of-line normalization, take 2 (now ..., Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Sat May 8, 2:46 pm)
[PATCH/RFC v2 2/4] Add tests for per-repository eol normal ..., Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Sat May 8, 2:46 pm)
[PATCH/RFC v2 3/4] Pass eol conv mode as an argument inste ..., Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Sat May 8, 2:46 pm)
[PATCH/RFC v2 4/4] Add per-repository eol normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Sat May 8, 2:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 1/4] Add "core.eolStyle" variable to con ..., Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 8, 2:57 pm)