So I at least agree with the semantics now, but I think that we really
would be better off just calling it "core.crlf". I don't _care_ whether
people think it's a bad name - much worse than a bad name is to use a name
that is not consistent.
Having two config variables named "core.autocrlf" and "core.crlf" at least
is consistent. Having "autocrlf" and "eolStyle" is just messed up.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html