Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Friday, May 7, 2010 - 10:10 am

On Fri, 7 May 2010, Junio C Hamano wrote:


The existing crlf attribute is a no-op _unless_ core.autocrlf is set, 
isn't it?

The whole point of Eyvind's series is to be able to set crlf attributes 
without having to set the config option - because he wants to make sure 
that a new clone always gets the proper crlf handling without users 
having to do anything extra.

And I do have to say that it makes sense.

I also do think that maybe we could just change the existing crlf 
attribute to work even without 'core.autocrlf'. 

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Ramkumar Ramachandra, (Wed May 5, 6:27 am)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Wilbert van Dolleweerd, (Thu May 6, 12:29 am)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Erik Faye-Lund, (Thu May 6, 3:03 am)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 6, 10:15 am)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Erik Faye-Lund, (Thu May 6, 10:26 am)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 6, 1:23 pm)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Erik Faye-Lund, (Thu May 6, 1:40 pm)
[PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Thu May 6, 3:27 pm)
[PATCH/RFC 2/3] Add tests for per-repository eol normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Thu May 6, 3:27 pm)
[PATCH/RFC 3/3] Add per-repository eol normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Thu May 6, 3:27 pm)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Erik Faye-Lund, (Thu May 6, 4:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 7, 10:10 am)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Fri May 7, 12:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Fri May 7, 12:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Finn Arne Gangstad, (Fri May 7, 12:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Fri May 7, 1:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Fri May 7, 1:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Fri May 7, 2:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Fri May 7, 2:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, A Large Angry SCM, (Fri May 7, 3:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Sun May 9, 12:49 am)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Anthony W. Youngman, (Tue May 18, 8:13 am)