Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Erik Faye-Lund
Date: Thursday, May 6, 2010 - 10:26 am

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

Just for completeness: The inverse is also the case on Windows; a lot
of editors will handle LF endings, but a handful of them will insert
gladly insert CRLFs under certain circumstances. Microsoft Visual
Studio is one of these.

So yeah, neither CRLF or LF everywhere is generally a good idea.

-- 
Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Ramkumar Ramachandra, (Wed May 5, 6:27 am)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Wilbert van Dolleweerd, (Thu May 6, 12:29 am)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Erik Faye-Lund, (Thu May 6, 3:03 am)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 6, 10:15 am)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Erik Faye-Lund, (Thu May 6, 10:26 am)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 6, 1:23 pm)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Erik Faye-Lund, (Thu May 6, 1:40 pm)
[PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Thu May 6, 3:27 pm)
[PATCH/RFC 2/3] Add tests for per-repository eol normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Thu May 6, 3:27 pm)
[PATCH/RFC 3/3] Add per-repository eol normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Thu May 6, 3:27 pm)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Erik Faye-Lund, (Thu May 6, 4:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Fri May 7, 12:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Fri May 7, 12:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Finn Arne Gangstad, (Fri May 7, 12:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Fri May 7, 1:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Fri May 7, 1:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Fri May 7, 2:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Fri May 7, 2:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, A Large Angry SCM, (Fri May 7, 3:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Per-repository end-of-line normalization, Eyvind Bernhardsen, (Sun May 9, 12:49 am)
Re: What should be the CRLF policy when win + Linux?, Anthony W. Youngman, (Tue May 18, 8:13 am)