On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted text
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > I think another way of addressing the same problem would be to redefine
> > "reachable" in this context as "reachable from any current ref".
> 
> I tend to agree, but I haven't thought through the case for entries that
> point at commits on detached HEAD.  My gut feeling is that unless they are
> connected to a real ref by now after all these expireunreachable days,
> they are "failed experiments" and deserve to get pruned, so "from any ref"
> would probably work well for them.

I'm a bit worried about this discussion.

What's the point of having a reflog for unreachable stuff if it is to be 
pruned faster than stuff that is already reachable without any reflog?


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html