Re: [PATCH] Document ls-files -t as obsolete.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Daniel Grace
Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 - 7:47 am

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:


Why -m? I have a script that attempts to ask just this question and I
don't use -m. Reading the documentation, I'm not sure why I would. In
what cases would I get wrong information without -m? For the record, I
also don't use -t, though using -t in this case does make sense to me,
I just apparently didn't notice that bit of the documentation when
writing that feature.

Daniel
http://www.doomstick.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Document ls-files -t as obsolete., Matthieu Moy, (Wed Apr 14, 6:45 am)
Re: [PATCH] Document ls-files -t as obsolete., Junio C Hamano, (Wed Apr 14, 7:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] Document ls-files -t as obsolete., Tor Arntsen, (Wed Apr 14, 7:47 am)
Re: [PATCH] Document ls-files -t as obsolete., Daniel Grace, (Wed Apr 14, 7:47 am)
Re: [PATCH] Document ls-files -t as obsolete., Matthieu Moy, (Wed Apr 14, 7:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] Document ls-files -t as obsolete., Matthieu Moy, (Wed Apr 14, 7:58 am)