Re: Update on SoC proposal: git-remote-svn

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Michael Barr
Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 - 5:52 am

Hi Steve,


I encountered this issue with my first attempt to validate the output of 
my dump conversion tool. My case wasn't as dire, 350GB would
have sufficed but I was working in a 160GB partition.
Checking out tags side by side is a sure way to fill your disk.


The svn dump format is not quite that silly, even without deltification
it doesn't output blobs that are just an unaltered copy from a
previous revision.
Handling deltified dumps will greatly increase the complexity of the
import process. Blob content would have be computed from existing
blobs rather than simply passed through.


Being able to handle a dump stream reassembled from such
piecewise dumps is an important feature which I haven't finished
implementing yet.


Thanks for the feed.

--
David Barr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Update on SoC proposal: git-remote-svn, Ramkumar Ramachandra, (Mon Apr 12, 10:29 pm)
Re: Update on SoC proposal: git-remote-svn, Sam Vilain, (Tue Apr 13, 1:34 am)
Re: Update on SoC proposal: git-remote-svn, Sverre Rabbelier, (Tue Apr 13, 9:01 am)
Re: Update on SoC proposal: git-remote-svn, Steven Michalske, (Tue Apr 13, 11:33 pm)
Re: Update on SoC proposal: git-remote-svn, David Michael Barr, (Wed Apr 14, 5:52 am)
Re: Update on SoC proposal: git-remote-svn, David Michael Barr, (Wed Apr 14, 10:15 am)