On 10-04-13 6:30 PM, Jakub Narebski wrote:
quoted text > On Tue, 13 April 2010, Charles Bailey wrote:
>> On 01/04/2010 06:36, Mark Rada wrote:
>>> @@ -84,13 +92,14 @@ endif
>>>
>>> all:: gitweb.cgi
>>>
>>> +FILES = gitweb.cgi
>>> ifdef JSMIN
>>> -FILES=gitweb.cgi gitweb.min.js
>>> -gitweb.cgi: gitweb.perl gitweb.min.js
>>> -else # !JSMIN
>>> -FILES=gitweb.cgi
>>> -gitweb.cgi: gitweb.perl
>>> -endif # JSMIN
>>> +FILES += gitweb.min.js
>>> +endif
>>> +ifdef CSSMIN
>>> +FILES += gitweb.min.css
>>> +endif
>>> +gitweb.cgi: gitweb.perl $(GITWEB_JS) $(GITWEB_CSS)
>>>
>>
>> I have a question about this last line of the patch. Are GITWEB_JS and
>> GITWEB_CSS supposed to be a source path or a URI?
>>
>> The documentation for install (and my previous assumption) was that they
>> represented the path on the target web server. I'm used to overriding
>> them so that gitweb.cgi can live in my /cgi-bin directory, but the
>> static files are served from /gitweb which is readable but not executable.
>>
>> After this patch I had to removed $(GITWEB_JS) and $(GITWEB_CSS) from
>> the list of dependencies for gitweb.cgi otherwise make failed.
>>
>> Have I got the wrong end of the stick?
>
> Thanks a lot for noticing this bug.
>
>
> GITWEB_JS and GITWEB_CSS were originally meant to be URI to file with
> gitweb JavaScript code and default gitweb stylesheet,... but during work
> on minification of JavaScript code and CSS file it somehow got confused
> to mean source path.
>
> If I remember correctly the original patch, before adding required
> support for minified gitweb.js and gitweb.css to git-instaweb script,
> and before support for CSS minification had
>
> ifdef JSMIN
> gitweb.cgi: gitweb.perl gitweb.min.js
> else
> gitweb.cgi: gitweb.perl
> endif
>
> which should probably be replaced in current situation by
>
> ifdef JSMIN
> gitweb.cgi : gitweb.min.js
> endif
> ifdef CSSMIN
> gitweb.cgi : gitweb.min.css
> endif
>
> just adding prerequisites to gitweb.css target in gitweb/Makefile
>
>
> I guess that support for adding minifiction support to git-instaweb
> would need to be more complicated. Perhaps
>
> $(notdir $(GITWEB_JS)) # Makefile function
>
> or
>
> $(basename $GITWEB_JS) # shell command
>
> But I guess that it wouldn't work for all cases...
>
Aw, frig, never thought of using gitweb like that so I made some
assumptions to make things cleaner looking.
I think this can be fixed by just using different variable names? Or
perhaps some nested ifdef's? I'm not sure which will be better.
I wasn't at the computer today so I'm just getting to it now, I'll try
to have something when in the next day, going to bed now. Good night.
--
Mark Rada
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html