On 10.04.2010 21:58 CEST, Johannes Sixt wrote:
quoted text
>Am 10.04.2010 06:39, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>I used to religiously rebase slushy topics that are not in any stable
>>integration branches (we used to have only 'master' and 'pu'), and
>>
>>	git rebase master foo
>>         git rebase master bar
>>         git rebase master baz
>>
>>was far easier to type than
>>
>>	git checkout foo&&  git rebase master
>>	git checkout bar&&  git rebase master
>>	git checkout baz&&  git rebase master
>
>I'm actually very glad that the current interface is the way it is -
>because it can do the rebase *without* the checkout. This way you can
>save a lot of recompilation due to changed timestamps if the topic is
>based on an old version.
>
>Only that some (all?) variants of rebase still unnecessarily do the
>checkout...

 Is there any chance for merge to behave the same? I really like that I
 don't have to do a checkout prior rebasing.

        Thanks,
-- 
		Michal Vitecek		(fuf@mageo.cz)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html