Re: Suggestion on git-push --porcelain

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Junio C Hamano
Date: Tuesday, February 9, 2010 - 7:57 pm

Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> writes:


Sorry, but I don't see what that would solve.  For example, we used not to
give the destination to the standard output stream, but that line carries
a necessary information and Larry's series corrects that.

In your "prefix with PORCELAIN" scheme, such a change will start adding a
new line "PORCELAIN To ..." that older implementations may not be prepared
to see.

Other than making the output more noisy, I do not see an improvement here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Suggestion on git-push --porcelain, Tay Ray Chuan, (Tue Feb 9, 7:34 pm)
Re: Suggestion on git-push --porcelain, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Feb 9, 7:57 pm)
Re: Suggestion on git-push --porcelain, Larry D'Anna, (Tue Feb 9, 8:35 pm)
Re: Suggestion on git-push --porcelain, Jeff King, (Tue Feb 9, 9:54 pm)
Re: Suggestion on git-push --porcelain, Tay Ray Chuan, (Wed Feb 10, 4:18 am)
Re: Suggestion on git-push --porcelain, Tay Ray Chuan, (Wed Feb 10, 4:28 am)
Re: Suggestion on git-push --porcelain, Junio C Hamano, (Wed Feb 10, 12:14 pm)