On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> wrote:
quoted text
> Am 12.12.2010 07:38, schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
>> Scott Kyle wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Scott Kyle wrote:
>>
>>>>> If I set the "submodule.<name>.ignore" then diffing around inside my
>>>>> history will not show the changes to that particular submodule.
>>>>
>>>> Even if you set it to "dirty"?
>>>
>>> Setting it to "dirty" is far less disruptive, you're right, but that
>>> wouldn't do me much good since my submodules are often on different
>>> branches while developing.
>>
>> Ah, I see now.  How about something like this?  Untested, just a
>> vague sketch to show the idea.
>
> Me thinks your proposal of a new "worktree" option makes sense. Let's
> hear what Scott says ...
>

I mostly really like how 'worktree' can let me focus in on only the
submodules I care about.  The drawback is that git status would no
longer list my true status.  I know that may sound hypocritical, but I
intended for this patch to only affect my PS1.  At the same time, I
would like to see the 'worktree' patch taken, regardless of whether
you guys find mine useful.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html