Git stores no per-file metadata. The closest we come is .gitattributes and .gitignore.
Git simply does not have the idea of the history of a file. Nothing in git will help merge "just a file" from one branch to another. Either we have merged the two commits or not.
HOWEVER...
You can use git-filter-branch to create a new branch that contains only that single file and only the commits that affected it. Something like the following (untested):
# Merging "file" from branch "src" to branch "dest"
git checkout -b temp src
git filter-branch --prune-empty --index-filter="git read-tree --empty; git add file"
# Since you describe the branch as "long-running", I'd suspect you'll have to wait a while here.
git checkout dest
git merge temp
git branch -d temp
git branch -D refs/original/temp
This will go faster if you have a ramdisk/tmpfs to perform the filtering in. (git-filter-branch is very I/O intensive.) Something like the following in place of the `git filter-branch` invocation above:
mkdir /tmp/filter-branch # Assuming /tmp is tmpfs or similar
git filter-branch -d /tmp/filter-branch --prune-empty --index-filter="git read-tree --empty; git add file"
rm -rf /tmp/filter-branch
You could use --msg-filter to add the SHA-1 of the original commits to the "file history" branch. Something like --msg-filter='cat;echo;echo From: $GIT_COMMIT'
I would recommend using cherry-pick to pull any further changes to the file across branches (be careful of commits that touch more than that file!). I think git-filter-branch could be used to keep the one file branch up to date, but that is likely more effort than it's worth. I would specifically advise against merging the single file branch into both "src" and "dest", as I think any later merge of the two would find these commits as a merge-base.
~~ Brian Gernhardt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html