Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

quoted text
> I do not mean that this new feature is useless nor stupid.  Being able to
> say "git push --delete branch1 branch2" matches _a_ mental model (perhaps
> Hg inspired one) _very_ naturally.  There are branches on the other side,
> and there is a special operation called 'delete' that you can inflict on
> them.
>
> But it is a different mental model of how git natively does "push".
> ...
> These are both valid models.  They just do not mix, so let's avoid
> confusion by not allowing both at the same time.

One more thing.  I suspect that adding --delete and nothing else probably
makes things worse than not doing anything.

In a mental model where "push there --delete $branch" is natural, there
are branches on the other side, and when you run 'push' command, you name
the special operation, 'delete', that you would want to inflict on them.

In such a world, there probably are other (perhaps not so special)
operations you can inflict on the branches on the other side as well.
They are probably called something like:

	push there --create $branch $commit
	push there --update $branch $commit

If you give them only --delete without completing the vocabulary by giving
these operations as well, you would force people to mix "git native" world
model (i.e. there is no "mode" nor "opration"; there is only "list of
instructions, each of which encodes the equivalent of 'mode'") with this
Hg-inspired world model.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html