On Feb 12, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Adam Panayis wrote:

quoted text
> Once this is done I double check my branches and it shows I still  
> only have the master. Perfect. However, when I check the file I  
> edited on my local machine on the blah branch, the changes are there.
>
> Am I fundamentally misunderstanding the correct usage of git? Is  
> this result expected?

Yes, git pull will never change anything on the remote side. You  
should use 'git push' for that. But, you shouldn't push to repository  
with a working directory unless you know what you're doing -- read http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitFaq#non-bare 
  for that.

- Pieter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html