On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 12:47:24AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:

quoted text
> There is a slightly different approach we could take, too: keep the
> "deletion" hunk as a first-class hunk, and just meld the content hunk's
> output into it. Then both cases would get the "Stage deletion" question
> instead of the "Stage this hunk" you get now for non-empty files (which
> just happens to trigger a deletion due to the headers).

BTW, the code for this is the much smaller change below. If you prefer
that, I can squash in the test and write up an appropriate commit
message.

diff --git a/git-add--interactive.perl b/git-add--interactive.perl
index 35f4ef1..02e97b9 100755
--- a/git-add--interactive.perl
+++ b/git-add--interactive.perl
@@ -1217,7 +1217,11 @@ sub patch_update_file {
 	if (@{$mode->{TEXT}}) {
 		unshift @hunk, $mode;
 	}
-	if (@{$deletion->{TEXT}} && !@hunk) {
+	if (@{$deletion->{TEXT}}) {
+		foreach my $hunk (@hunk) {
+			push @{$deletion->{TEXT}}, @{$hunk->{TEXT}};
+			push @{$deletion->{DISPLAY}}, @{$hunk->{DISPLAY}};
+		}
 		@hunk = ($deletion);
 	}
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html