On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Karl Chen <quarl@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
quoted text
>
> How about an option to git-branch that just prints the name of the
> current branch for scripts' sake?  To replace:
>
>    git branch --no-color 2>/dev/null | perl -ne '/^[*] (.*)/ && print '

I tend to support your request especially that extracting the current
branch is something that is done regularly. Looking in my own scripts/aliases
and some of my colleagues, there are plenty of variation using Perl,
sed, awk, tr
and Python to extract the current branch.

Using git-symbolic-ref is not obvious, especially that the summary/name
 of the man page is :

"git-symbolic-ref - Read and modify symbolic refs"

But the description is pretty clear :

"Given one argument, reads which branch head the given symbolic ref refers to
and outputs its path, relative to the .git/ directory. Typically you
would give HEAD
as the <name> argument to see on which branch your working tree is on."

But naturally, as a lazy user, you will pick git-branch especially
that's the tools is listed
with the most commonly used git commands with a very attractive description :

"branch     List, create, or delete branches"

On an user perspective, having the option in git-branch seems more natural.

Just a comment,

-- 
--                   Alexandre Dulaunoy (adulau) -- http://www.foo.be/
--                             http://www.foo.be/cgi-bin/wiki.pl/Diary
--         "Knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance
--                                that we can solve them" Isaac Asimov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html