El 15/1/2009, a las 19:46, Johan Herland escribió:

quoted text
> On Thursday 15 January 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> 'stop' would be closest to what it currently does.  It stops and it
>>> is up to you how to screw up the result ;-).
>>
>> But it shares the first letter with 'squash'.
>
> Personally, I'd rather use "pause", but that is taken as well.
>
> Other suggestions:
>
> wait
> yield
> rest
> timeout

Perhaps stating the obvious, but:

wait - best suggestion so far, seeing as we can't use "stop"

yield - might sound intuitive to a Ruby programmer; but for others  
it's probably not so obvious as "yield" has a number of meanings in  
normal English similar to "give up", "give over" etc

rest - not quite as good as "wait"; machines wait for humans, but the  
never need to rest

timeout - sounds like an error condition, so not really appropriate

Sorry for participating in the painting. Just thought that "wait" was  
good enough to merit some positive feedback.

Cheers,
Wincent



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html