Jakub Narebski wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Jeff King wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:42:52PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted text
> > Now, that being said:
> > 
> > > After reading the discussion so far, I am still not convinced if this is a
> > > good idea, nor this time around it is that much different from what the
> > > previous "prior" link discussion tried to do.
> > 
> > For the record, I am not convinced it is a good idea either; I was
> > hoping to steer it in a direction where somebody could say "and now this
> > is the useful thing we can do now that we could not do before." If the
> > ultimate goal is to put links to other commits into history viewers,
> > then the commit message is a reasonable place to do so. The only thing I
> > see improving with a header is that it makes more sense for pruning and
> > object transfer.
> 
> I'm also not all convinced that 'cousin'/'origin'/'changeset'/'cset'
> header is a good idea.  I only tried to steer discussion in good
> direction if it is somewhat a good idea.

By the way, beside graphical history viewers it would also help rebase
(and git-cherry) notice when patch was already applied better.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html