Re: rsync vs. git-push/pull ? (+kudus)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: david
Date: Saturday, September 6, 2008 - 11:27 pm

On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Ramagudi Naziir wrote:


the git files are names by their content so you don't need to worry about 
them being named differently


the problems you can run into with rsync all end up related to one of two 
things.

1. what happens if the sync gets interrupted

2. what happens if the source gets updated during the sync

in your case these cannot happen without you knowing it, so you should be 
ok.

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
rsync vs. git-push/pull ? (+kudus), Ramagudi Naziir, (Sat Sep 6, 11:11 pm)
Re: rsync vs. git-push/pull ? (+kudus), david, (Sat Sep 6, 11:27 pm)
Re: rsync vs. git-push/pull ? (+kudus), David Brown, (Sun Sep 7, 12:38 am)
Re: rsync vs. git-push/pull ? (+kudus), Ramagudi Naziir, (Tue Sep 9, 11:31 pm)
Re: rsync vs. git-push/pull ? (+kudus), Ramagudi Naziir, (Tue Sep 9, 11:35 pm)
Re: rsync vs. git-push/pull ? (+kudus), Matthieu Moy, (Wed Sep 10, 12:05 am)
Re: rsync vs. git-push/pull ? (+kudus), david, (Wed Sep 10, 6:27 am)