Re: RFC: perhaps a "new file" should not be deleted by "git

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Eric Raible
Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008 - 1:26 pm

Mike Hommey <mh <at> glandium.org> writes:


Yes I realize that.

My point was that the file is entirely gone (except via "git fsck").
I wouldn't expect the reflog to reference it, but I was just mentioning
it for completeness (since it's often help in recovering from types of
lossage).



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: RFC: perhaps a "new file" should not be deleted by "git , Eric Raible, (Thu Sep 11, 1:26 pm)