Re: Show of hands, how many set USE_NSEC

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Friday, August 8, 2008 - 11:00 am

On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

Ok, at that point I certainly agree.  

As long as we're talking about a single flat file, I don't think it would 
be all that painful to have a totally new index format. The original 
format was (obviously) designed to be just mmap'ed and turned into a C 
array with no real parsing.

But once we started building a separate index data structure with internal 
structure _anyway_ (for the extended in-memory flags and the filename 
hashing), a lot of the reasons for the original format kind of went away.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Show of hands, how many set USE_NSEC, Shawn O. Pearce, (Fri Aug 8, 9:34 am)
Re: Show of hands, how many set USE_NSEC, Johannes Schindelin, (Fri Aug 8, 9:55 am)
Re: Show of hands, how many set USE_NSEC, Shawn O. Pearce, (Fri Aug 8, 9:57 am)
Re: Show of hands, how many set USE_NSEC, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 8, 10:42 am)
Re: Show of hands, how many set USE_NSEC, Shawn O. Pearce, (Fri Aug 8, 10:52 am)
Re: Show of hands, how many set USE_NSEC, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 8, 11:00 am)
Re: Show of hands, how many set USE_NSEC, Robin Rosenberg, (Wed Aug 13, 1:01 pm)