Re: Missing pieces for 1.6.0 on MinGW?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@...>, Steve Haslam <shaslam@...>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>, Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@...>, <git@...>
Date: Sunday, August 3, 2008 - 6:45 am

Hi,

On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Johannes Sixt wrote:


For both issues, IMHO Steve's patches should be superior, as they (with my 
proposed lookup_program_in_path()) would not only make relative 
ETC_GITCONFIG work on MinGW, but everywhere else, too.  Obsoleting 
mingw_main, of course.

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Missing pieces for 1.6.0 on MinGW?, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Aug 2, 3:05 pm)
Re: Missing pieces for 1.6.0 on MinGW?, Johannes Sixt, (Sun Aug 3, 5:16 am)
Re: Missing pieces for 1.6.0 on MinGW?, Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Aug 3, 6:45 am)
Re: Missing pieces for 1.6.0 on MinGW?, Steffen Prohaska, (Sun Aug 3, 6:17 am)
Re: Missing pieces for 1.6.0 on MinGW?, Björn, (Sun Aug 3, 6:10 am)
Re: Missing pieces for 1.6.0 on MinGW?, Steffen Prohaska, (Sun Aug 3, 4:52 am)