On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 01:10:14PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:I think just freezing the UI is not a good answer. Git's UI evolved too wildly and uncontrollably in the early days and I think in the long run, tweaking out at least some of the inconsistencies is good idea, IMHO. Not that I would think there should be any more *major* changes upcoming, I mean mostly small stuff (all that I hate the git-checkout/git-reset dichotomy or git-add/git-rm asymetry, touching this would be just too radical change by now, IMHO). The only problem I can see with the transition were the deprecation messages, as was mentioned much earlier in the thread. If it's going away in few years, Git should start to nag about it now. Then, all whom it concerns _will_ realize this and slowly transition at their own pace. Also, maybe we should require all internal references and documentation updated when *declaring the feature deprecated* (not when removing it), even if it means delaying the phase-out; that was the other major complaint in this thread that is worth remembering, I believe. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis The next generation of interesting software will be done on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC. -- Bill Gates -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| David Chinner | Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md. |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Trent Piepho | Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
