Hi,
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 05:34:43PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

quoted text
> > On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Russell King wrote:

> > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:17:05PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> > > > We didn't know the conversation was going on.  Why should we?  We only

> > > > use the tool, not develop it.  I'm also not on the mailing lists for

> > > > mutt, vim, gcc, binutils, openssh, grep, xchat, mozilla, gnome, xpdf or

> > > > any of the dozens of other programs I use on a daily basis.

> > >

> > > Well said Matthew, as a git _user_ I completely agree.

> >

> > So are you effectively saying that we should have asked on all the mailing

> > list of existing and potential Git users to ask their opinions?

>

> No.  I'm effectively saying that *you shouldn't break backwards

> compatibility*.  Ever.  It only annoys people.

This is something that comes out of a male cow, and from his back exit.
You are saying that something that was deprecated loooong time ago should

be kept for backwards compatibility reasons.  That cannot hold, and you

know that.
Anyway, you even failed to address my complaint, namely that Russell did

not give us a _chance_.  He did not read the mailing list on which the

issue was discussed -- and again, it is not a compatibility issue.  But he

wanted to be notified.  Like they say, you cannot have your cake and eat

it, too.
As to everybody who still wants to complain that git-xyyx is so much

better than "git xyyx": face it, it's the better solution for almost

everybody except for you.  Cope with it.
Oh, and I am sorry if it broke your scripts, but they are easy to fix.  I

know, because I had to fix mine, too.
Ciao,

Dscho
--

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in

the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org

More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html