On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 05:34:43PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
No. I'm effectively saying that *you shouldn't break backwards
compatibility*. Ever. It only annoys people.
Including:
- The maintainer who has to listen to all this whining
- Everyone who gets this thread cc'd in their inbox
- People who hadn't been informed of the new way of doing things
- People who thought they'd got their own way and now have to suffer
the 'silent majority' speaking up.
- Linus
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Stephen Rothwell | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Patrick McHardy | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
