On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 05:34:43PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:No. I'm effectively saying that *you shouldn't break backwards compatibility*. Ever. It only annoys people. Including: - The maintainer who has to listen to all this whining - Everyone who gets this thread cc'd in their inbox - People who hadn't been informed of the new way of doing things - People who thought they'd got their own way and now have to suffer the 'silent majority' speaking up. - Linus -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Jon Smirl | 463 kernel developers missing! |
| Nigel Cunningham | Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Greg KH | Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scan... |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series.. |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
