Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> writes:Oh, I wasn't talking to you, or "we as git users". The user side of the discussion has long been over in another thread titled "[kernel.org users] README and ChangeLog files" that was started by HPA, and everybody now knows that the conclusion of the discussion was that 1.6.0 transition was underadvertised to the end-user community and caused pain. Sorry about that, but let's leave it behind. What has happend has happened. The discussion in this thread was about how to go forward from here, now the transition is over. One of the future directions the transition was aiming at was removal of git-foo form for built-ins even from the libexec area -- I was complaining about David's beating an offtopic dead horse in the above, because it was throwing the thread in an off-track direction, distracting everybody from discussing what was more important, discussing constructively if/how to proceed from here. Now the primary topic of what to do about built-ins have already settled. We _will_ keep git-foo commands in the libexec area. We won't be removing them. So there is no need to worry. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Nigel Cunningham | Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Paul Mundt | Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm2 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
