On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:I wouldn't say I vetoed i, but wasn't it pretty obvious from the whole discussion that a fair number of people want to keep git-xyzzy? So getting rid of git-xyzzy altogether would seem to be stupid, and not listening to users. So I'm not "vetoing" it, but I don't think git maintainers (past _or_ current ;) have been stupid, or unable to listen to people, and as such I think the end result is pretty obvious. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Parag Warudkar | BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0] |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
