Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:Well, this was partly my fault, as I did not make it clear in this part that beating the horse that has been dead for two years is not a productive way to spend out time. I however did, in the part David did not quote, try to make it clear: That's all history now anyway. We should try to do better the next time, which is much more important, and that is the topic of this message. Now, we haven't set the timeframe yet, but the original plan, advocated by Linus and others, was to eventually stop installing "git-foo" form on the filesystem for builtin commands. If we were to do this, we should plan how the deprecation period for this change should look like. I think the sequence of events would look like this: that we are now talking about what we can do better from here going forward, but these paragraphs were separated from the quoted part that describes what kind of *variations* are possible in addition to the "the sequence of events would look like this:" list, and allowed David to make an out of context quoting that made a comment on an offtopic tangent look as if it were one of the valid alternatives. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Sunil Naidu | Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc6 |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children. |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
