Hi, On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:You might have realized that this was not a proper patch with a commit message and a SOB? As for Cc: I agree. But not for S-O-B: this is not an email header. And I was very specific in only changing the behavior for "pretty=email". At least _I_ was surprised that pretty=email did not behave as if it was outputting email headers. I agree with Linus for pretty=non-email, but not at all for pretty=email. For the given scenario send-email is completely irrelevant. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Srivatsa Vaddagiri | containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH take 2] pkt_sched: Protect gen estimators under est_lock. |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerhard Pircher | 3c59x: shared interrupt problem |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
