Hi, Jakub Narebski wrote:I'm wondering about "and you don't leave much time for review". A comment on this: LH (from the Google Open Source Team) clarified that the state of Aug 18 is not the date where everything should be reviewed and merged in. It is the date where the (following) evaluation (done by the mentor) of the code is based on. See also http://groups.google.com/group/google-summer-of-code-announce/browse_thread/thread/df7... Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>, PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| H. Peter Anvin | Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
| Nicolas Pitre | Re: [RFC patch 08/18] cnt32_to_63 should use smp_rmb() |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
