On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Björn Steinbrink wrote:Yes, interesting. The delta cache was really a huge hack that just turned out rather successful. It's been hacked on further since (to do some half-way reasonable replacement with _another_ hack by adding an LRU on top of it), but it really is very hacky indeed. The "hash" we use for looking things up is also pretty much a joke, and it has no overflow capability, it just replaces the old entry with a new one. I wonder how hard it would be to replace the whole table thing with our generic hash.c hash thing. I'll take a look. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Ingo Molnar | Re: x86: 4kstacks default |
| Stephen Rothwell | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Trent Piepho | [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #10919] [regression] display dimming is slow and laggy - Acer Travelmate 661lci |
git: | |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
