On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
Yes, interesting.
The delta cache was really a huge hack that just turned out rather
successful. It's been hacked on further since (to do some half-way
reasonable replacement with _another_ hack by adding an LRU on top of it),
but it really is very hacky indeed.
The "hash" we use for looking things up is also pretty much a joke, and it
has no overflow capability, it just replaces the old entry with a new one.
I wonder how hard it would be to replace the whole table thing with our
generic hash.c hash thing. I'll take a look.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| David Miller | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
