Andreas Ericsson wrote:=20 =46or the fun of it, I ran a test without deltas. Here's my normal git.git: $ du -h .git/objects/pack 26M .git/objects/pack $ git rev-list --all | wc -l 17638 $ git rev-list --all --objects | wc -l 82194 On a hot cache I get about 61800 objects/sec: $ /usr/bin/time git rev-list --all --objects >/dev/null 1.33user 0.04system 0:01.39elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident= )k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+8087minor)pagefaults 0swaps I then made a copy of that and repacked it without deltas (remember to remove *.keep, I tripped over that twice): $ git repack --depth=3D0 --window=3D0 -a -f -d Counting objects: 82906, done. Writing objects: 100% (82906/82906), done. Total 82906 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) $ du -h .git/objects/pack 339M .git/objects/pack Which results in only 28739 objects/sec: $ /usr/bin/time git rev-list --all --objects >/dev/null 2.86user 0.11system 0:02.98elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident= )k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+50162minor)pagefaults 0swaps So maybe the GCC repository would need to be packed _better_? Unfortunately I cannot sensibly run the same test on linux-2.6.git, which is the next bigger git I have around: it inflates to about 3GB after the repack, which does not fit into memory. =2D Thomas =2D-=20 Thomas Rast trast@student.ethz.ch
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Greg KH | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
