On Aug 12, 2008, at 23:15, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:Sure, but that really is not that much of an issue. For people with large systems connected by very fast networks, the current situation is probably fine, and spending a lot of effort for packing often makes sense. However, for a random repository of Joe User, all the effort spent on packing will probably never be gained back. Most people just suck content from upstream and at most maintain a couple of local hacks on top of that. Little or nothing is ever pushed to other systems. Even when pushing to other systems, this often is just a handful of objects though a slow line and compression/decompression speeds just don't matter much. One nice optimization we could do for those pesky binary large objects (like PDF, JPG and GZIP-ed data), is to detect such files and revert to compression level 0. This should be especially beneficial since already compressed data takes most time to compress again. -Geert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers. |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
