On 7/31/08, Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> wrote:What would be *really* great is if we could find a way for multiple local clones to share the same objects, refs, and configuration - ie. without pushing and pulling between them at all. Then they could *all* point at the remote upstream repo through "origin", and pushing/pulling with that repo would update the objects and refs for all the local repos. I'm not sure of the best way to do this, though. In particular, it seems like having multiple work trees checked out on the same ref could be problematic. Is that just what git-new-workdir is for? (It seems to be undocumented so it's hard to tell.) And what about this .gitlink/.gitfile stuff I've heard about? Could I use that to have multiple work trees share the same .git folder? Thanks, Avery -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Justin C. Sherrill | Re: pkgsrc bulk build and tiff |
| Jeremy Allison | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Matt Thomas | Re: Add a MAP_ALIGNED flag for mmap(2). |
| Vsevolod Stakhov | Unicode support in iso9660. |
| Jaromir Dolecek | Re: Speeding up fork/wait path |
| matthew green | re: merge of freebsd eventhandler |
git: | |
| Petr Janda | KDE and OpenSSL = Broken |
| sam | Re: Loader not found |
| Erick Perez | Re: dragonfly pdf documentation |
| Michel Talon | Re: Compatability with FreeBSD Ports [debian package tools] |
