Home » Mailing list archives » git » 2008 » July » 30

Re: cvs diff -l equivalent?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
To: Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@...>
Cc: <git@...>
Subject: Re: cvs diff -l equivalent?
Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 - 5:25 pm

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:


Not without patching, no. When generating a patch, git diff always 
recurses.

I suspect adding some kind of "-l" flag would be about five lines of code, 
though, so if you really need it... Hint, hint.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
cvs diff -l equivalent?, Stephen R. van den Berg, (Wed Jul 30, 4:20 am)
Re: cvs diff -l equivalent?, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Jul 30, 5:25 pm)
Re: cvs diff -l equivalent?, Mikael Magnusson, (Wed Jul 30, 4:57 pm)
Re: cvs diff -l equivalent?, Thomas Rast, (Wed Jul 30, 10:00 am)
Re: cvs diff -l equivalent?, Stephen R. van den Berg, (Wed Jul 30, 12:17 pm)
Re: cvs diff -l equivalent?, Johannes Schindelin, (Wed Jul 30, 9:53 am)
Re: cvs diff -l equivalent?, Stephen R. van den Berg, (Wed Jul 30, 11:58 am)
Re: cvs diff -l equivalent?, Johannes Schindelin, (Wed Jul 30, 2:18 pm)