On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 04:35:19PM +0200, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:Please, don't. It adds completely unnecessary complexity and it is _not_ grafting anymore - look the word up in a dictionary. :-) Have a look at what you wrote above - now, Git already has a way to store all this information, right? In the commit objects! So, the real solution is to take the commit objects you want to modify, create new commit objects, then graft the new commit on all the old commit children. It fits neatly in the Git philosophy, there is no need at all to tweak the current infrastructure for this and it should be trivial to automate, too. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis The last good thing written in C++ was the Pachelbel Canon. -- J. Olson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview) |
| Parag Warudkar | BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0] |
git: | |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH RFC] [4/9] modpost: Fix format string warnings |
| Rick Jones | Re: Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
| Antonio Almeida | HTB accuracy for high speed |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
