Hi, On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Petr Baudis wrote:I heard this a lot of times now. I think it is not "harsh", but "direct". There is nobody saying "you are a bloody fool". At least not in the first response, and certainly not without explaining why. Sure, I, for one, am not overly polite. I do not start my mail with "It is such a nice thing that you decided to provide a patch. I am certain that you know C pretty well, but there _might_ be a few _tiny_ improvements, would you indulge with me to let them lay out in front of you?" I do not do that because it goes without saying in Open Source that I would not _bother_ to reply if I was not interested. And it Just Wastes My Time. Maybe I should start my mails with "Disclaimer: I only reply to you because I am interested in your patch." Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH x86] [0/16] Various i386/x86-64 changes |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jeff Kirsher | [net-next PATCH 1/7] e1000e: enable CRC stripping by default |
| Jukka Andberg | ata/wdc vs gcc3 on amiga |
| YAMAMOTO Takashi | Re: wd.c patch to reduce kernel stack usage |
| Jason Thorpe | Re: ksyms patches. |
| rick | NFS transport |
