Hi,
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Petr Baudis wrote:
> (ii) The tone on the mailing list seems frequently unnecessarily
I heard this a lot of times now. I think it is not "harsh", but "direct".
There is nobody saying "you are a bloody fool". At least not in the first
response, and certainly not without explaining why.
Sure, I, for one, am not overly polite. I do not start my mail with "It
is such a nice thing that you decided to provide a patch. I am certain
that you know C pretty well, but there _might_ be a few _tiny_
improvements, would you indulge with me to let them lay out in front of
you?"
I do not do that because it goes without saying in Open Source that I
would not _bother_ to reply if I was not interested. And it Just Wastes
My Time.
Maybe I should start my mails with "Disclaimer: I only reply to you
because I am interested in your patch."
Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
