Hi,

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 04:25:16AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Scott Chacon wrote:
> 
> > A followup on the post I did a few days ago about Git documentation.
> > I forked Petr's git.or.cz site and put up a version that I think is a
> > bit more accessible and newbie-friendly at git-scm.com.
> 
> I do not like the implication that Git eats trees.

  yes, I keep wondering about the logo as well. On one side it is rather
amusing, on the other side... somehow it didn't win my heart over and it
*does* look somewhat unprofessional.

quoted text
> I also do not like that the link to "Documentation" looks more like a 
> too-short cheat-sheet.

  I personally don't find the idea of having direct links to the most
used commands bad, though I'm not sure how useful will it be in
practice.

quoted text
> But then, I think that git.or.cz looks more professional (read: more 
> respectful, less geekish), so I think there is not much harm in that.

  Note that I tried to fix up a lot of bits that I felt were a little
too colloquial in my patch series I linked in a previous mail.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
As in certain cults it is possible to kill a process if you know
its true name.  -- Ken Thompson and Dennis M. Ritchie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html